Last week in one of my seminar classes, I found myself defending
educational technology. In this course- The Art of Teaching – our goal is to dissect the language of teachers and
teaching and try to reevaluate what it means to ‘teach’ in today’s world. Many in the class felt that technology was
taking away the personal connection between teacher and student that is so important
for making a classroom a community. While
I can understand some of the skepticism, I had to intervene. Educational technology today is
not what it
was a few years ago. The plethora of
tools and multimedia that can be used in the classroom are no replacement for
an actual person, but they do allow for a level of interactivity that far
exceeds just text-based communication.
not what it
was a few years ago. The plethora of
tools and multimedia that can be used in the classroom are no replacement for
an actual person, but they do allow for a level of interactivity that far
exceeds just text-based communication.
My conversation with my classmates made me think more about what
it means to teach through technology, and the importance of maintaining a ‘personal
touch’ whether you are blogging, podcasting, Voice-Threading, or facilitating an
online course. There are different types
of communication in face to face classes, and the same should be true of
classes that use technology. It is ok to
have a ‘go to’ technology that you know works in your classroom (I, for
example, use my LCD projector every day.
It is part of the routine, my students know when they walk in to look at
the projector screen for the day’s task) but also try to mix it up and try
different media formats to keep it interesting and to make sure the students
are exposed to a variety of tools while they are in your classroom. Using a classroom website/wiki, digital
portfolios, or a blog is also a great way to incorporate a technology into the
classroom routine without making it mundane.
Part of the skepticism that exists among veteran or
technology-inexperienced teachers stems from a lack of knowledge and comfort with
the technology. We are all here because
we want to learn, but there are far too many educators out there who are
comfortable with the status-quo. The
fact of the matter is that their students are the ones who lose. How can this be combated? We can mandate technology use until we’re
blue in the face, but it is not going to make a difference if the teachers don’t
buy into it. Professional learning
communities that allow for mentorship are a step in the right direction, but
the most important piece is time.
I am reminded of Jesse Spano's meltdown on Saved By the Bell - there's no time, there's never any time!
Resistant educators look at technology as ‘one more thing they have to
do.’ Schools should provide teachers with the time (professional development
afternoons, for example) to experiment with the technology and develop a
comfort with it so it can be used in the classroom. These afternoons can be most beneficial when
teachers are allowed to work in their own classrooms or in small learning
groups with an experienced technology steward to offer guidance and
support. Teachers are just like the students they teach when it comes to technology: they need to be given the time, the resources, the flexibility, and the freedom of direction (lets call it teacher differentiation) to flourish.
I am reminded of Jesse Spano's meltdown on Saved By the Bell - there's no time, there's never any time!
Resistant educators look at technology as ‘one more thing they have to
do.’ Schools should provide teachers with the time (professional development
afternoons, for example) to experiment with the technology and develop a
comfort with it so it can be used in the classroom. These afternoons can be most beneficial when
teachers are allowed to work in their own classrooms or in small learning
groups with an experienced technology steward to offer guidance and
support. Teachers are just like the students they teach when it comes to technology: they need to be given the time, the resources, the flexibility, and the freedom of direction (lets call it teacher differentiation) to flourish.
Education doesn’t have to change as much skeptics think it
does in order to embrace technology. I’ve
included Taylor Mali’s ‘What Teachers Make’ to stress the fact that the teacher
is still an important force in the classroom and ‘what teachers make’ doesn’t necessarily
change when technology is introduced. Maintain the personal touch. Technology does not have to mean a sterilization of the classroom - it is just another way for kids to express themselves and to learn.
Ellen I feel your pain!! Teachers resistant to change is my number one pet-peeve! They do see it as just another thing they have to do and it is not fair for their students. Teachers must adapt with the times otherwise they will not stay relevant to their students. Teachers are committed to learning, so that means they themselves must be open to learning. It is ironic that they complain about time because technology really makes everything so much easier. It saves us time and when it comes to personalizing lessons, technology gives us the opportunity to allow each student have a customized personalized education.
ReplyDelete